Skip to content
Back to news
SocialSecurityNewsMonday, June 15, 2026IndividualPro

A New Bipartisan Push to Fix Social Security’s Shortfall

By SocialSecurityNews Editorial Team · Last reviewed June 15, 2026 · How we review

With Social Security’s trust fund headed for trouble around 2032, lawmakers are floating fixes — the latest a bipartisan bill to create a commission. Nothing is law yet. Here’s the proposal and the full menu of options on the table, explained neutrally.

Social Security’s long-term funding gap is back in the headlines, with senators and representatives pressing for action. The most concrete step so far: a bipartisan bill to create a commission that would recommend a plan to keep the program solvent. Important context up front — nothing here is law, and none of it changes your benefits today. This is about the debate over how to close a gap that’s still years away.

The news: a bipartisan commission bill

On June 10, 2026, Reps. Tom Cole (R-OK) and Tom Suozzi (D-NY) introduced the Bipartisan Social Security Commission Act. It would set up a 13-member commission, with members appointed by both parties, charged with producing recommendations and draft legislation to keep Social Security solvent for at least 75 years. To force genuine compromise, at least 9 of the 13 members would have to approve before anything reached Congress.

Supporters point to the 1983 Greenspan Commission, which produced a bipartisan deal that extended the program’s solvency for decades. Critics of the commission approach argue it can be a way to delay hard votes. Either way, it’s a bill to study and recommend — not a fix in itself — and it would still have to pass.

Why this is happening now

Social Security’s retirement trust fund is projected to fall short around 2032. If lawmakers do nothing, an automatic across-the-board cut of roughly 24% would follow, because incoming payroll taxes would cover only part of scheduled benefits. (We explain that in our 2032 trust-fund outlook.)

The menu of fixes — and the trade-offs

There’s no shortage of ideas; the hard part is agreeing on who pays. Realistic fixes raise revenue, trim future benefits, or combine both:

  • Raise or remove the payroll tax cap. In 2026, wages above $184,500 aren’t subject to Social Security tax. Eliminating that cap would close roughly two-thirds of the shortfall on its own. This is favored more by Democrats; some, like Sens. Warren and Sanders, would apply the tax to income above $250,000.
  • Trim benefits for the highest earners — for example, capping the largest benefits, which would initially affect only a small share of recipients at the top.
  • Raise the full retirement age — reducing lifetime payouts for future retirees. This is favored more by some Republicans.
  • Raise the payroll tax rate (currently 6.2% each from worker and employer), or change how the annual COLA is calculated.

Most serious plans mix several of these. Acting sooner generally means smaller, more gradual changes.

What it means for you

Nothing changes today. These are proposals, and even the commission bill is just a process to produce a plan. Your current benefits are unaffected, and any real change would be debated and voted on first. Don’t let solvency headlines rush your claiming decision — that should still come down to your own health, work, and finances (see when to claim).


This article is for general education and is not financial or political advice. It describes proposed legislation and policy options; none are enacted. Details are drawn from the bill’s sponsors and nonpartisan budget analysts — confirm current status at congress.gov and ssa.gov.

Frequently asked questions

Is Social Security being cut?
Not now. The retirement trust fund is projected to fall short around 2032; if lawmakers don’t act, an automatic cut of roughly 24% could follow then. Current benefits are unchanged, and lawmakers are debating fixes.
What did Congress just propose?
Reps. Tom Cole (R-OK) and Tom Suozzi (D-NY) introduced a bipartisan bill to create a 13-member commission that would recommend a plan — and draft legislation — to keep Social Security solvent for 75 years. It is not law; it’s a proposal to produce a plan.
What are the main options to fix the shortfall?
Raising or removing the payroll tax cap, trimming benefits for the highest earners, raising the full retirement age, raising the payroll tax rate, or changing the COLA formula. Most realistic plans combine several.
Will my benefits change because of this?
No — not from these proposals. Nothing has been enacted, and any change would have to be debated and passed by Congress first.
Has a commission like this worked before?
Yes. The 1983 Greenspan Commission produced a bipartisan agreement that extended Social Security’s solvency for decades. Whether a new commission can repeat that is the open question.
solvencylegislation2032

Reference: SocialSecurityNews

Get the free 2026 Social Security Cheat Sheet

The key numbers, claiming ages, and a pre-claim checklist — on one page. Plus a short, plain-English weekly update. No hype, no spam.

Free · Unsubscribe anytime · We never share your email.